Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Looks like my next MacBook Pro will have a 17-inch screen

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Because Apple has neutered the 15-inch models with an SD card reader instead of something, oh I don’t know, professional like a FUCKING EXPRESSCARD SLOT.

And just because enough people bitched about FireWire being stripped from the 13-inch portables doesn’t mean you can add it back on, praise it like a gift from Jesus, and call it a “pro” portable when it has integrated video.

And maybe I’m just a bit cynical when I say that Apple is looking to have more retail shelf space available by not stocking spare batteries because STEVE JOBS SAYS YOU DON’T NEED A SPARE BATTERY ANYMORE. YOU’LL LIKE THIS ONE JUST FINE.

But people will buy them, and a few of us will be sitting in the corner bitching about lack of options.  Bleh.

My Day Is Ruined, For No Good Reason

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

So, I recently found out that the vast majority of Apple’s wireless gear, including the AirPort Extreme, AirPort Express, and Time Capsule hardware is built by Ambit.  Anyone who has known me for a while knows that I HATE Ambit cable modems with the fire of a thousand suns.  They are quite crappy, in my personal experience, and knowing that my beloved Apple AirPort Extremes are OEMed by Ambit was like taking a shit in my Cheerios.

However, this does not change the fact that, AirPort Extreme hardware is amazingly solid and extremely reliable.  I have had FEW problems ever with my AirPort gear, and it just goes to show that the design of the product means more than almost anything else, and even with a crappy OEM, you can have a great marketable device.

I also found out, as a total aside, that the Foxconn plant in Fullerton, CA assembled my Power Mac G4 and still assembles Mac Pro and Xserve hardware for Apple to this day.  Any of your “Pro” Apple hardware that is labeled as “Assembled in USA” is probably built by Foxconn in Fullerton or Dallas, TX.  There’s also a Quanta plant in Fremont, CA that does some assembly of stuff like (going by the serial numbers of shipping product) the iMac and MacBook, but my guess is that it does less than the plants in China.  If anyone is actually interested in this shit, I’ll post more in the future.

Trent Reznor, I Love You

Monday, May 4th, 2009

http://forum.nin.com/bb/read.php?9,651569,651569#msg-651569

I Fucking Hate Adobe

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Like most folks in their mid- to late-20s, I’ve at some point used copies of Adobe’s software that was not necessarily purchased legitimately.  I know, I know, you’re shocked and dismayed.  Over the past year, I’ve made a point to do two things: get legitimate licenses to every piece of software on my system AND not have any Adobe shit installed on my system.  I’ve succeeded with the first, and have succeeded as much as possible with the second.

Let’s get this out of the way: Adobe’s software used to be pretty fucking cool.  And in some ways, it still is.  I have wet dreams about running Photoshop 3.0.5 on an 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro with 32GB of RAM filled with Velociraptor drives and Quadro cards because that would be the best photo editing setup EVER MADE.  PS3 was quite simply the best mix of features, size, speed, and stability of any version of Photoshop I can remember.  Since that point, it has only gotten worse.  And since that point, Adobe’s licensing bullshit has gotten astronomically worse.

I’ll say that I work in a direct customer-facing position where my job is to support my employer’s products.  Because of the nature of the job, and the customers, it has become incumbent on myself and my coworkers to support EVERY OTHER COMPANY’S PRODUCTS if is can so much as be imagined to interface with my employer’s products.  I have the utter joy of explaining to a customer why their $1500 Creative Suite 2 installation won’t work properly on an Intel Mac and why Adobe’s activation scheme, much like WGA, forces them to reactivate the software with a phone call whenever they pass gas.  This happens ALL THE TIME.

Lots of examples of Adobe’s bullshit can be had here, here, here, and especially here.

They have my ass in a corner when it comes to Flash.  I keep that shit updated because, as is evidenced by their Acrobat dev team’s skill, they can’t keep it together when it comes to zero-day arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities.  However, since Flash is necessary to use most of the intartubes, I use the glorious free ClickToFlash plugin for Safari/WebKit. Coupled with Safari AdBlock (yeah, I know it’s funny since I have Google Adsense on this site anyways) my web browsing experience is much less likely to cause a seizure and only loads Adobe’s goddamned Flash plug-in when I want it to be loaded.

I currently use Pixelmator, VectorDesigner, ChocoFlop, Graphic Converter, Aperture, VueScan, and Raw Photo Processor to work with the various images in my day-to-day life.  And while that may give you readers pause, let me tell you, it’s absolutely great not having to think about what shit is going to go down on my system the next time I launch a CS program.  Coupled with the fact that it’s all legitimately purchased software, I feel like I’ve been liberated from the shackles of Adobe.  Much like Linux users are supposed to feel when they rid themselves of Microsoft, except I’m actually getting shit done on my operating system.

I’m no so naïve as to think that the world has no use for Adobe Creative Suite. I know that many folks would not be able to get their work done without the full fledged versions of Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign.  However, I’ll attest to being one happy motherfucker when I realize I don’t need their crap on my system any more. That, my friends, is a good feeling.

Notes From The “My MacBook is too fragile” Bullshit Pile

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

So, another dumbass, this one named Jeannine, decided to post on MyBiggestComplaint.com about how their MacBook was only dropped a few times:

My macbook screen cracked, too. It has been dropped a couple of times, but nothing major. I also have a PC laptop that has been through much more and it has no damage. I have read many, many complaints about the MacBook screens being very delicate. As much as I love my MacBook, I am really disappointed witht the quality of the shell and screen. To fix this, I have found it will be approximately $800 or more. If these MacBooks are going to have these problems, they really should be able to fix these for much less. I am having to decide between fixing it and paying that ridiculous amount, trying to fix it myself with on line tutorials and a screen purchased from e-bay or just buying a new Mac. If so many people are having these problems, why aren’t they being addressed by Mac?

Aside from the simple fact that Mac makes MAKEUP and Apple makes COMPUTERS you dumb bitch, I decided to reply on the page with this amazingly relevant piece:

After dropping my baby daughter a couple of times, nothing major, she has a bunch of medical problems and learning disabilities. I also have a son who was dropped WAY more often and he has no problems at all. As much as I love my daughter, I’m really disappointed with the quality of the female gender’s infant state. To fix this, I’ve found it will be thousands of dollars per month for medical care and supervision. If these babies are going to have these problems, they really should be able to be disposed of more easily. I am having to decide between putting up with her issues, spending that ridiculous amount of money on medical care, trying to fix her myself with tutorials from WebMD and Wikipedia, and putting her in a trash can and trying for another boy. If so many people are having these problems, why aren’t they being addressed by God?

Seriously people.  The way you treat your computers, when viewed in the context of the way you treat your infant children, is completely unacceptable.  Treat your computer as you would a newborn child and you will rarely have a problem with it.  Shit is unavoidable sometimes.  You could have a colicky baby and you could have a MacBook with a weird, intermittent fan problem.  But when you drop your child and he ends up sounding like Barney Frank later in life, don’t blame it on someone else!

When you drop your damn computer, shit is going to go wrong with it!  Back up your data, take it to a professional, and get it fixed as soon as possible.  Most of the time, if you pay for a repair of the damage and everything else is certified as A-OK, anything that goes wrong down the road is covered under whatever warranty you have left on the machine (assuming you don’t fuck up and drop it again.)  Try getting that guarantee out of your pediatrician!

The iPod Shuffle Costs Apple $22 to build. Stop Bitching and Build It Yourself

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

I’m fucking tired of any douche pundit or supposed technology expert complaining about Apple marking up their music player that, according to someone who isn’t actually doing the work, cost Apple $22 in parts.  This, according to BusinessWeek’s info from iSuppli, doesn’t include manufacturing labor, R&D, marketing, IP licensing, and anything else aside from the shit in the box.

So why is everyone complaining about their favorite (or not) company charging so much for the iPod Shuffle?  If Apple doesn’t present the world with cupcakes and fucking sunshine every quarter, the stock tanks to shit and everyone is discussing how Apple is going to lose its place in the world’s music market.  How does Apple get to the top of profit margins in the industry? Gouging the hell out of you while making you enjoy the gouging every step of the way.  And I’m all for it.

Sure, the Shuffle takes a little bit of cash to build.  But do you enjoy it?  Did you think it was worth every penny you spent on it before you realized it was $22 in bits of Chinese garbage thrown together in a pretty machined aluminum case?  Of course you did. Only now that your wallet feels betrayed by the marketing machine of Cupertino will you feign dismay at their overcharging you for the music player you use at the gym to flash at someone, hoping to get their attention.

To anyone who is complaining: shut your mouth and build one yourself.  Asustek, or their spinoff company Pegatron, is making a killing assembling these things for Apple faster and better than any douche in the USA could do it for.  And if they could, would you really want to pay $275 for a union-built, certified by Al Gore zero-emission iPod Shuffle?  Not me.

(PS: I’m basing my Asustek assertion on the serial numbers I’ve seen of the new Shuffle.  Foxconn may be building them, too, but as far as I know, the “4H” serial prefix was designated to Asustek.)

DMG Compression: An Open Letter to Mac Developers

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

I am not a programmer, nor will I ever claim to be one. One thing that annoys me about shipping products for download is that developers do not take advantage of the fantastic opportunity afforded to them by Apple’s advanced compression options for disk images.

I was on my honeymoon last year, and Garmin’s RoadTrip software, at version 2.0, had some serious bugs.  I really needed to download the 2.0.1 update. I was in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean on a cruise ship with SLOW internet access.  I consider it a modern miracle to have internet access on the ship ANYWAYS, but I digress.  After downloading the large disk image, I ran it through DropDMG‘s bzip2 compressor and shaved something like 30MB off of the disk image file.  If Garmin had done that in the first place, they’d have cut down on the internet time I had to burn downloading the damn thing, plus they would save a little on their bandwidth costs.  I’m sure that 30MB per download of their Mac software is negligible, but still worth taking into consideration.  Bottom line is that there’s no good reason to ship a disk image that mounts as read/write, nor is there a good reason to ship a non-compressed DMG.  Devs: prove me wrong.

Now, some of you losers still running OS X 10.3 might be complaining about not being able to use bzip2 compressed DMGs.  Lucky for you, Apple still supports legacy zlib compressed DMGs.  And if you’re running 10.0 and need an ADC compressed image, you need to figure out how the hell you got to this website in the first place and SERIOUSLY re-evaluate your technological budget.

Now, this part of my rambling is going to be an unsolicited whoring of myself for Michael Tsai over at C-Command.  Not only is DropDMG one of my favorite utilities for DMG archival and processing, his other big product SpamSieve is quite possibly the most brilliantly written third-party spam filters ever made.  It is essentially seamless with OS X Mail, and support for all of his products is completely first-rate.  No other spam filter has ever worked as well as his for my use, and I cannot thank him enough for saving my inbox.

So, developers, please save your customers time and support a wonderful member of your community: process your DMGs properly through DropDMG before posting them for download.  I’ll be happy, and isn’t that really all that matters?

GoDaddy Kills Kittens (I Have Proof)

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

OK, so I lied about the GoDaddy killing kittens thing.  I will say something that I do have proof of: GoDaddy is not a good deal for registering your domains.  Why? Let me tell you.

So, my wife does a little side business of wedding planning stuff and she wanted to get some domains.  We priced them out on my previous registrar of choice, GoDaddy.  $140 or so for the 4 domains for 3 years each.  Looking around for coupon codes got us a best price of right around $120.  Then, for giggles, I decided to price them out on DreamHost (my web host of choice.)  They are $9.95 each. Period. No coupon codes, no BS. Cheaper than GoDaddy.

Now, I could have received DIRT CHEAP domains by buying into GoDaddy’s crappy hosting or even crappier email services, but why would I spend more money to get a discount if all I’m getting out of it is a lighter wallet, more crap, and the domain I wanted?  Good question.

Sooooooo, I’ve decided to bail on GoDaddy.  Good riddance to their crap infested site and shady small-print marketing techniques. Imagine how cheap their domains would be if they didn’t waste resources with all of their stupid flashy animations or actresses who have to pay for breast implants.

The other thing I hate about GoDaddy, just to pile it on, is that if you make ANY change to your domain aside from unlocking it, they put a transfer hold on it for 60 days.  Good job Mr. Diligent Domain Owner for correcting a typo in your address before posting your domains for sale.  You just screwed yourself for 2 months!  Yeah, Bob Parsons is a twit, and his way of making money is kinda like trying to get your rebate from Best Buy: make it just hard enough that most people will give up and keep writing checks.  Way to go, jackass.

iTunes selling HD movies now. How about BD-R next?

Friday, March 20th, 2009

So, now that you can buy and rent HD video content from your computer using iTunes, is it not a logical step to want to view your HD content on your HDTV?  Given, one can do that if you’ve got a Mac mini home theater system or an AppleTV, but what if you just have a good ol’ BluRay player?  I think that the best thing Apple could do to introduce BluRay to the Mac is to allow burning HD video to BD-R discs in iTunes.

When iTunes music was still DRMd, you could burn it to an unencrypted audio CD and still play it on your stereo.  With the plummeting costs of BD-R drives, and relatively low cost of BD-R media, I think that now would be a fantastic opportunity to allow the conversion of the video into a (maybe even still DRMd) more usable format! Given, most of us would prefer a non-restricted format, but most folks are just looking to play their content in a format they have easy access to. Audio CD is one format. BluRay is another.

I know that licensing these things is a pain in the anus, but I believe Apple could own the market in downloadable-to-BluRay video, and it should not be underestimated.

FUCK APPLE

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/apple-adds-still-more-drm-ipod-shuffle

EDIT 2009-03-18:
It would seem that Apple has not restricted so much as made the documentation available only to those who wish to properly license the “Made for iPod” certification mark on their products.  Assuming nobody C&Ds independent manufacturers of headphones who reverse engineer but don’t infringe on the certification mark, I’m not against this.  Sorry for the alarm.